Costs at a rent tribunal: when you can claim, when you might pay (Rule 13) — tenant walkthrough 2026
One of the biggest fears that stops tenants challenging a rent increase is the thought of a costs bill if they lose. The good news is that the rent tribunal almost never orders one side to pay the other's costs: each side normally bears its own. There is a narrow exception, Rule 13, for unreasonable behaviour, and it can cut both ways. This walkthrough explains how costs really work at the First-tier Tribunal, when you could ask for your costs back, when a landlord might try it on against you, and what to write if you need to make or answer a costs application. England only, Section 13 rent challenges.
For a lot of tenants, the single biggest thing stopping them challenging a rent increase is a quiet, nagging worry: what if I lose and end up with a bill for the landlord's costs? It is a reasonable fear, because that is exactly how the County Court usually works. The good news is that the rent tribunal is built on the opposite principle. As a general rule, each side pays its own costs, whatever the outcome.
This walkthrough explains how costs actually work at the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), the one narrow exception you need to know about, and what to do if you want to claim your costs or have to answer a costs application from the landlord. It covers England only and assumes the case is a Section 13 rent challenge.
The default rule: no costs
The starting point is simple. The property tribunal does not normally make one party pay the other's costs. You can challenge a Section 13 notice, lose, and walk away owing the landlord nothing beyond your own expenses. The same is true the other way round: if you win, the landlord does not automatically have to pay your costs either.
This no costs rule is deliberate. The tribunal was designed to be used by ordinary people without lawyers, so the rules avoid the costs risk that puts so many people off going to court. It means the worst realistic financial outcome of a genuine, sensible challenge is that the tribunal confirms or adjusts the rent, not that you face a costs bill on top.
There is one important caution that is separate from costs: the tribunal decides the market rent, and before the Renters' Rights Act changes it could in principle set a rent higher than the landlord proposed. Make sure you understand which rules apply to your case before you refer it. But that is about the rent figure, not about costs.
The exception: Rule 13
The one route to a costs order is Rule 13 of the tribunal's procedure rules. It is narrow, and it cuts both ways. The two limbs that matter for a rent case are:
- Wasted costs caused by the improper, unreasonable or negligent conduct of a representative.
- Costs caused by unreasonable behaviour by a party, or their representative, in bringing, defending or conducting the proceedings.
The second limb is the one most relevant to tenants and landlords acting for themselves. The key word is unreasonable, and it is a high bar.
What counts as unreasonable behaviour
Unreasonable behaviour is conduct that no reasonable person in the same position would have pursued. It is judged on what the party did, not on who won. Things the tribunal has been willing to treat as unreasonable include:
- Ignoring the tribunal's directions, for example failing to file evidence by the deadline.
- Failing to attend a hearing without a good reason or any explanation.
- Pursuing or defending a case that is plainly hopeless, with no real prospect of success.
- Making false or misleading statements to the tribunal.
- Deliberately causing delay, or running up the other side's costs needlessly.
What is not unreasonable:
- Losing a genuine argument.
- Making honest mistakes as a litigant in person.
- Simply disagreeing strongly with the other side.
The threshold is set high on purpose, so that ordinary people are not frightened away from the tribunal by the risk of costs. If you think the landlord has crossed the line, the way to make that stick is concrete examples with dates, not a general complaint that they were difficult.
When a landlord might try a costs application against you
It is worth knowing that Rule 13 can be aimed at you too. A landlord who is annoyed at being challenged might threaten a costs application to pressure you into dropping the case. In almost all genuine challenges this is an empty threat, because bringing a reasonable challenge that fails is not unreasonable behaviour.
You only put yourself at risk if you do something like ignore directions, fail to show up, or pursue a case you have been clearly told is hopeless and then carry on regardless. So the practical protection is simple: engage properly, meet the deadlines, turn up, and keep your case grounded in real grounds to challenge. Do that and a Rule 13 application against you has nothing to bite on.
When you can claim your costs from the landlord
If the landlord has behaved unreasonably, you can apply under Rule 13 for an order that they pay the costs their conduct caused you. As a tenant representing yourself, your recoverable costs are usually modest, but they can still include genuine out-of-pocket expenses such as:
- The cost of obtaining evidence (for example paying for comparable rent data or a report).
- Postage, printing and copying directly caused by the landlord's conduct.
- Reasonable time off work, if the tribunal accepts the landlord's unreasonable behaviour caused it.
You will not recover costs just because you won. You have to point to the specific unreasonable conduct and show what it cost you. That is why a dated record matters so much.
How to apply (and the deadline)
You apply in writing to the tribunal, on the existing case reference, and there is a time limit: a costs application must normally be made within 28 days of the date the tribunal sends out its final decision. Do not leave it.
Your application should:
- Identify the limb of Rule 13 you rely on (almost always unreasonable behaviour).
- Set out exactly what the other side did, with dates, that was unreasonable.
- Attach a short schedule of the costs you are claiming, with receipts or a simple breakdown.
The tribunal will give the other side a chance to respond before deciding, and may deal with it on the papers or at a short hearing. Keep it factual and proportionate, and resist the urge to re-argue the rent.
The 47 pound fee is a separate point
The application fee for a rent case (currently 47 pounds) is not part of the no costs rule about each side's legal costs. It is a fee you pay to bring the case. If you are on a low income or certain benefits, check whether you qualify for help with fees before you apply, because a remission removes the cost entirely. If the landlord's unreasonable conduct is what forced you to apply, you can also ask the tribunal to order them to reimburse the fee as part of a Rule 13 application.
Template: Rule 13 costs application (adapt to your case)
To: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Case reference: [number] From: [your name], tenant, [property address]
Application for costs under Rule 13
I apply for an order that the landlord pay the costs set out below. I rely on Rule 13 on the basis that the landlord acted unreasonably in [bringing / defending / conducting] these proceedings.
The unreasonable conduct:
- On [date], the landlord [describe what they did, e.g. failed to comply with the directions order requiring evidence by [date]].
- On [date], [next example with date].
- [Continue as needed, dated and specific.]
Costs caused by that conduct: I attach a schedule of the costs I have incurred as a direct result, totalling [amount], with supporting evidence.
I make this application within 28 days of the tribunal's final decision dated [date]. I am content for the application to be decided on the papers, but I am willing to attend a hearing if the tribunal directs one.
[Signature, date]
Template: responding to a landlord's costs application
To: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Case reference: [number] From: [your name], tenant
Response to the landlord's application for costs under Rule 13
I oppose the application. The tribunal operates on a no costs basis and Rule 13 applies only to wasted costs or unreasonable behaviour, neither of which arises here.
- I brought a genuine challenge on reasonable grounds, namely [briefly state your grounds]. Bringing a reasonable challenge that does not succeed is not unreasonable behaviour.
- I complied with the tribunal's directions [or explain any difficulty and what you did about it].
- [Answer each specific allegation the landlord makes, factually.]
I ask the tribunal to dismiss the application.
[Signature, date]
The bottom line
The fear of a costs bill is the single most common reason tenants talk themselves out of challenging a rent increase, and in almost every genuine case that fear is misplaced. The tribunal is a no costs forum. As long as you engage properly, meet the deadlines and keep your case grounded in real grounds to challenge, Rule 13 has nothing to bite on. And if the landlord is the one behaving unreasonably, Rule 13 gives you a way to make them pay for it.
If you are not sure whether your notice gives you grounds to challenge in the first place, a free check is the place to start before you ever get near costs.
This guide is general information about how costs work at the First-tier Tribunal in England, not legal advice. For advice on your own case, contact Citizens Advice, Shelter, or a housing solicitor.
Frequently Asked Questions
+If I lose my rent challenge at the tribunal, will I have to pay the landlord's costs?
Almost certainly not. The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) works on a no costs basis as a general rule, which means each side pays its own costs whatever the outcome. You can lose the case, with the tribunal confirming or even raising the landlord's proposed rent, and still not face a bill for the landlord's costs. This is very different from the County Court, where the losing side often pays the winner's legal costs, and it is one of the main reasons the rent tribunal is designed to be accessible to ordinary tenants without lawyers. The only realistic way costs come into it is the narrow Rule 13 power, which is about a party behaving unreasonably during the case, not about who won or lost. So the simple fear of a costs bill should not stop you challenging a notice you believe is wrong.
+What is Rule 13 and when does the tribunal order someone to pay costs?
Rule 13 is the tribunal's limited power to order costs in specific situations. The two that matter for an ordinary rent case are wasted costs caused by a representative's improper or negligent conduct, and costs where a party (or their representative) has acted unreasonably in bringing, defending or conducting the proceedings. Unreasonable conduct is a high bar. It means things like ignoring the tribunal's directions, making a hopeless application with no real prospect of success, failing to turn up without explanation, or behaving in a way that needlessly runs up the other side's costs. Simply running a case that ultimately fails is not unreasonable, and nor is being a litigant in person who makes ordinary mistakes. The tribunal also has to give the person a chance to respond before making any order, so you would not be ambushed with a costs order out of the blue.
+Can I claim my own costs back from the landlord if I win?
Only in the narrow Rule 13 situations, not just because you won. If your landlord has behaved unreasonably, for example by serving a hopeless notice, refusing to engage, breaching the tribunal's directions, or dragging things out without justification, you can apply under Rule 13 for an order that they pay the costs their conduct caused you. In practice tenants who represent themselves have limited out-of-pocket costs to claim, but you can still recover genuine expenses such as the cost of obtaining evidence, postage, copying, or time off work if the tribunal is persuaded the landlord's unreasonable conduct caused them. The key is to keep a clear record of what the landlord did, when, and what it cost you, and to make the application promptly, normally within 28 days of the final decision.
+What counts as unreasonable behaviour at the tribunal?
Unreasonable behaviour is conduct that no reasonable person in the same position would have pursued, and it is judged on what the party did, not on whether they ultimately won. Examples that have been treated as unreasonable include ignoring directions to file evidence, failing to attend a hearing without good reason, pursuing or defending a case that is plainly hopeless, making false or misleading statements, or deliberately causing delay. What is not unreasonable is losing a genuine argument, making honest mistakes as a litigant in person, or simply disagreeing strongly with the other side. The threshold is deliberately high so that ordinary people are not deterred from using the tribunal by the fear of costs. If you think the landlord has crossed the line, focus on concrete examples with dates rather than general complaints about their attitude.
+How do I actually apply for a costs order, and is there a deadline?
You apply in writing to the tribunal, ideally on the same case reference, setting out which limb of Rule 13 you rely on, exactly what the other side did that was unreasonable, and a schedule of the costs you are claiming with evidence. There is a time limit: an application for costs must normally be made within 28 days of the date the tribunal sends out its final decision, so do not leave it. The tribunal will then give the other side a chance to respond before deciding, and it can deal with the application on the papers or at a short hearing. Keep your application factual and proportionate, attach receipts or a simple costs breakdown, and avoid turning it into a re-run of the rent argument. The template wording in this guide gives you a structure to follow.
+Does the 47 pound tribunal fee count as a cost I can recover?
Possibly, but treat it as a separate point. The tribunal application fee (currently 47 pounds for a rent case, with help available if you are on a low income or certain benefits) is a fee you pay to bring the case, not part of the no costs rule about each side's legal costs. The tribunal has discretion to order the other party to reimburse a fee in some circumstances, and you can ask for it as part of a Rule 13 application if the landlord's unreasonable conduct is what forced you to apply. If you are worried about the fee in the first place, check whether you qualify for help with fees before you apply, because a remission can remove the cost entirely rather than leaving you to claim it back later.
Check your rent increase
Find out if your landlord’s Section 13 notice is valid. Free, anonymous, takes 2 minutes.
Free to check · £14.99 only if we find grounds
Keep reading
Related guides on tenant rights and rent increases.
No landlord name and address on your rent demands? Why the rent may not legally be due (s47/s48) — tenant walkthrough 2026
Here is a rule a lot of renters have never heard of. If your landlord has not given you a name and an address in England or Wales where you can serve notices on them, your rent is treated as not legally due until they do. It does not mean the rent is wiped, but it can be a genuine point of leverage, especially with a faceless agent or an absent landlord who only ever gives you a PO box or an email. This walkthrough explains sections 47 and 48 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 in plain English, what they do and do not give you, and how to ask for the missing details. England only.
Landlord ignoring the rent the tribunal set: how to enforce it and reclaim what you overpaid — tenant walkthrough 2026
Winning at the rent tribunal is one thing. Getting the landlord to actually charge the rent the tribunal set is another. Some landlords carry on demanding the figure they originally proposed, or keep deducting the higher amount by standing order, as if nothing happened. The tribunal's decision is binding, so you have clear options: insist on the correct rent, recover anything you have overpaid since the effective date, and if needed pursue it as a debt. This walkthrough explains exactly how, with a demand template and the money-claim route. England only, after a Section 13 determination.
Withdrawing or settling a rent tribunal challenge before the hearing: the tenant walkthrough 2026
Not every rent challenge has to go all the way to a hearing. If your landlord offers a sensible compromise, or if your evidence turns out weaker than you hoped, you may want to settle on an agreed figure or withdraw the challenge altogether. Both are legitimate, but they have consequences worth understanding first, especially what happens to the proposed rent and to your right to challenge again. This walkthrough explains how withdrawing and settling work, the risks of each, and how to do it safely, with a template you can adapt.
Asking the tribunal to set aside or correct its own rent decision: the tenant walkthrough 2026
Before you reach for an appeal, there is often a quicker, cheaper route. If your rent tribunal decision contains an obvious slip, or if something went wrong in the process, such as you not receiving the hearing notice, the First-tier Tribunal can correct or set aside its own decision. These powers are limited and have tight deadlines, but in the right case they fix the problem in days rather than months. This walkthrough explains when each power applies, how to ask, and what to write, with template wording you can adapt.
Appealing a rent tribunal decision to the Upper Tribunal: the tenant permission-to-appeal walkthrough 2026
If the First-tier Tribunal has decided your rent challenge and you believe it made a genuine legal mistake, you may be able to appeal to the Upper Tribunal. But appeals are not a second go at the same argument: you can only appeal on a point of law, you need permission first, and there is a strict 28-day clock that starts the moment the tribunal sends its reasons. This walkthrough explains what counts as an error of law, how to apply for permission step by step, and what to write, with template wording you can adapt.
Paper determination without a hearing (and bringing a McKenzie friend): the rent tribunal tenant walkthrough 2026
A rent challenge at the First-tier Tribunal does not always need you to attend a hearing. You can often elect a determination on the papers, where the tribunal decides on the documents alone. It is quicker and less stressful, but it puts all the weight on your written evidence. This walkthrough explains how to decide between a paper determination and an oral hearing, how to elect one, and, if you do attend, how a McKenzie friend can support you. It includes template wording for both choices.